(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA179720513; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 23:28:33 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from heather.wis.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA179610507; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 23:28:27 -0700
Received: from njland.UUCP (uunjland@localhost) by heather.wis.com (8.6.9/heather) with UUCP id BAA05743 for lightwave@webcom.com; Sat, 17 Jun 1995 01:08:54 -0500
To: lightwave@webcom.com
Subject: RE-PAR or NOT PAR (Thomas Healy
From: robert.cohen@njland.com (ROBERT COHEN)
Message-Id: <8AB6431.01F40006A2.uuout@njland.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 17:53:00 -0500
Organization: New JerseyLand 426 Slocum Ave Neptune, NJ 07753 908-918-8682
Reply-To: robert.cohen@njland.com (ROBERT COHEN)
X-Mailreader: PCBoard Version 15.21
X-Mailer: PCBoard/UUOUT Version 1.10
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi Thomas,
I had my Video Toaster/Lightwave combo for three and one half years
before being fortunate enough to afford the PAR. If you have the
fastest rendering machine you can afford, but no practical / affordable
means of getting your work to video...Then what's the point? I find
that situation most frustrating, personally. So.... I would strongly
suggest that if you can swing the bucks, go for the PAR. I don't think
you will regret it. As far the as the quality of the PC PAR over the
Amiga (I own Amiga), I have read multiple posts suggesting that the PC
is just as good (if not better) than the Amiga version.
Good luck...
robert.cohen@njland.com
--
robert.cohen@njland.com (ROBERT COHEN) sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com